Tom Marchant wrote: >You are applying a fix to a running product. One of the elements is in >library that is in the LPA list. Is that correct? If so, you might have >bigger issues than the LPA library.
Absolutely! >The LPA library is not used except at IPL time, so this may not be necessary. Except dynamic SVC, but I suppose the OP meant static SVC. >No, you can't add a library dynamically to LPALST. What do you think that >would mean? LPALST is read at IPL time to build the LPA. You can, however, >add modules to LPA **IF YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING**. Correct. I hope the OP has a sandbox to practise his tricks... >It's not my dog. Also not my dogs too! If it were my dogs, I would grab a bottle of pentobarbital to get rid of it. ;-) (No, of course, I'm not that cruel! ;-D ) Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
