In
<cae1xxdhosowjbjwsbdfaqjtt2namcqjsbg2y78y7heomz3a...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 07/23/2013
at 08:07 PM, John Gilmore <[email protected]> said:
>I am happy to have David join in my recommendation, and I can imagine
>a circumstance in which RLLG would be more useful than RLL, but RLL
>itself does 64-bit rotations.
"For ROTATE LEFT SINGLE LOGICAL (RLL), bits 0-31 of general registers
R1 and R3 remain unchanged."
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
