but , i feel there might be some performance degradation down the line . anybody has any suggestions ?
Regards, Bob > Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:21:38 +0530 > From: [email protected] > Subject: Re: MAXSPACE and central storage > To: [email protected] > > I dont think so . During our DB2 v10 upgrade, we had to increase maxspace > to 16000 M ,then we added only the local page datasets . > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Robert Hahne > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Greetings , > > > > We have a requirement in our shop to change the MAXSPACE value from 2000M > > to 8000M . IBM says there should be a 1:3 ratio between maxspace and > > auxiliary storage . that means , my total auxiliary storage needs to be > > increased by 3 times which is 24000 M (to satisfy 1:3 ratio) . I did that > > as well . Now my concern is that my Central storage is 5690 M and will it > > create any problem once i set the maxspace to 8000 M .I couldn't find any > > documentation which says central storage should be increased . I'm trying > > to understand how DUMPSRV address space works when it is allowed to capture > > a dump of 8000M in size considering my central and local page dataset sizes > > given above . we are on z/os 1.11 and thus AUXMGMT is set as ON by default . > > > > Please share your thoughts on this . > > > > > > Thanks in Advance , > > Bob > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
