Of course that particular issue is not specific to any one programming language...
>________________________________ > From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 7:17 AM >Subject: Re: Blame the COBOL, how clich é > > >In <[email protected]>, on >07/25/2013 > at 09:24 AM, Frank Swarbrick <[email protected]> said: > >>I wonder, exactly, how code is "corrupted". > >It's corrupted by human beings making sloppy and undocumented code >changes, which accrue over time. Any single change doesn't do much >damage, but the cumulative corruption can be massive. > >-- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> >We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. >(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
