This is not a debate, because then we might end up somewhere, this is a
religious controversy, where nobody will ever move from where he/she got
in it. I much like Duffy's contribution as an example of this.

Kees.

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 18:05
To: [email protected]
Subject: Mainframe vs Server - The Debate Continues

This was posted on the VM newsgroup and l thought I would pass it along

http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/opinion/Evolving-IT-needs-and-cap
abil
ities-restart-mainframe-vs-server-debate?asrc=EM_NLT_22746667&utm_medium
=EM&
utm_source=NLT&utm_campaign=20130729_Intel%20shifts%20focus%20to%20micro
%20s
ervers_ewatkins&track=NL-1811&ad=887900


or Tinyurl:    http://tinyurl.com/moxp5k8



One comment from the article:

"A mainframe is like one very large server that can do anything that
multiple servers in a rack are able to do. It's a virtualization
platform; its hardware is highly redundant, so it replaces a cluster of
servers. And, compared to all the x64 servers, it's not even that
expensive," said the data center architect.

Happy days

Lizette

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
********************************************************
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site: 
http://www.klm.com. This e-mail and any attachment may contain confidential and 
privileged material intended for the addressee only. If you are not the 
addressee, you are notified that no part of the e-mail or any attachment may be 
disclosed, copied or distributed, and that any other action related to this 
e-mail or attachment is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have 
received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by return 
e-mail, and delete this message. 

Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM), its subsidiaries and/or its 
employees shall not be liable for the incorrect or incomplete transmission of 
this e-mail or any attachments, nor responsible for any delay in receipt. 
Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (also known as KLM Royal Dutch 
Airlines) is registered in Amstelveen, The Netherlands, with registered number 
33014286
********************************************************
                        

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to