Yes, if we had the time, we would rewrite the job to use the output from IRRDBU00 instead of parsing LU * output. We'll probably have the time when IBM changes the output, of course. :-)
In any case, thanks to those who made suggestions here and off-list. The problem does appear to be in the process that reports the revoke status, not with RACF. So, the ID is not getting resumed without an SMF record being written, it was not revoked to begin with. At some point later, then, the job that interprets the RACF output gets it right. At least we have something to go on now rather than speculating about SMF. Regards, Greg Shirey Ben E. Keith Company -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Ed Gould Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 11:28 PM That is only one issue of screen scraping which we have talked on here before. Its like trying to take an IDCAMS listing and parse it out to be more user friendly. It works great until IBM changes it. IOW its not a programmed interface that IBM is willing to advertise. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
