In <[email protected]>, on
08/16/2013
at 10:40 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> said:
>Which I attribute, in turn, to excessive[1] exposure to Assembler's
>inconsistent syntax.
It's always a mistake to expect rules for one language to apply to
another. Of course, poor documentation doesn't help.
BTW, I would expect assuming similar behavior to that of PL/I to be
more common than assuming similar behavior to that of assembler.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
