Charles Mills wrote: >>*Most* time fields are built by the individual record cutting product. If a >>product wants to record time as Latvian Summer Time expressed in Roman >>numerals in its SMF records it is free to do so. Thus one cannot say "SMF >>time fields are thus and such" (unfortunately).
Indeed true for record types 128 - 255. You fill in your own headers yourself when working with SMFWTM or SMFEWTM. Paul Gilmartin wrote: >I'm shocked and dismayed. You mean that SMF (whatever that is) doesn't prefix >a standard header to the information supplied by the "record cutting product"!? SMFWTM or SMFEWTM will fill in (partially) for you for 0 - 127, but still you can write in whatever you want with IEFU83 if you want. You are free to be shocked+dismayed. Join the already shocked auditors for free... ;-D My auditors once b*tched in my tired ears about this. Too bad. Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
