Good point, Ed. Regarding my previous test and posting, I have my VSM rule set to "NO". So that could make a good reason for the results I saw.
On Thu, 19 Sep 2013 06:40:11 -0700, Ed Jaffe <[email protected]> wrote: >On 9/19/2013 5:17 AM, DASDBILL2 wrote: >> It sounds as if one of the allocation routines is getting some temporary >> storage but not zeroing all of it out, and the storage it happens to get >> contains residual data from whoever used some of that storage previously. > >That's exactly what I was going to suggest, DASDBILL! > >Barbara, what happens if you specify the following in DIAGxx? (Use SET >DIAG=xx to activate the change.) > >VSM UseZosV1R9Rules(YES) /* Use old-school GETMAIN/FREEMAIN */ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
