P.S., in the networking world, it is called a port number.

On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Anthony Thompson
<[email protected]> wrote:
> A socket descriptor (which seems to be a fancy name for a number) is 4 bytes.
>
> The output of BPX1SOC includes a 'socket vector', where the socket descriptor 
> is returned, which is a double word. It is eights bytes long because BPX1SOC 
> can request a socket pair.
>
> I don't know where you got 16 bytes from.
>
> Ant.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Donald Likens
> Sent: Thursday, 26 September 2013 11:24 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Confused by BPX1CON
>
> When invoking BPX1CON it states:
>
> Socket_descriptor
>      Supplied parameter
>      Type: Integer
>      Length: Fullword
>      The name of a fullword that contains the socket file descriptor for 
> which the
>      connect is to be done.
>
> It also states that this is the output of BPX1SOC and I also believe this to 
> be 16 bytes.
>
> My confusion is the Socket descriptor for what I am doing is 16 bytes long! I 
> believe this is defined in the next two parameters.
>
> What are they talking about for this fullword?
>
> A sample would explain a lot with field definitions (The examples in the book 
> do not show the DS statements for the calls.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN



-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to