I guess that good to know. And I can sort of see it, from what little I
remember of Turbo Pascal and Delphi, and a brief flirtation with Modula II.
I've only had the GCC Ada compiler, and I don't really know how standard it
is. But I don't think that Ada took off any better than PL/I did. So much
for either of them being the "one language to rule them all". On z/OS,
COBOL still seems to be King (at least in terms of number of lines of
customer code). On UNIX, C/C++ seems to still the be the main winner, but
with a large retinue of others (Perl, Python, Ruby, ...). On Windows, well
I plead ignorance and apathy: I don't know and I don't care. I despise
MS-Windows. As is likely well known by now.


On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> In
> <caajsdjhovrtxbmxk+bhdqwookpp7_h3z4mtthsyoyzyjfnj...@mail.gmail.com>,
> on 09/26/2013
>    at 09:10 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said:
>
> >"Ada is PL/I trying to be Smalltalk. -- Codoso diBlini
>
> Actually Ada comes from the Pascal tradition and is quite at variance
> with PL/I.
>
> --
>      Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
>      ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
> (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>



-- 
I have _not_ lost my mind! It is backed up on a flash drive somewhere.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to