Barry Merrill wrote: <begin extract> Is there really a reason to call a z/OS MEMORY ERROR a LEAK??? It's an ERROR. I know the Open Systems guys love to hide behind words that make it NOT seem to be their error, but why us??? <end extract/>
and I strongly agree that the use of euphemisms for what are in fact errors is undesirable. In this case, however, the use of 'leak' instead of 'error' is a very old practice. The phrase 'storage leak' has been used at least since the 1970s to characterize situations in which dynamically allocated [usually] heap storage is incompletely freed at the end of its use, so that the total amount of this storage available gradually diminishes, leaks away, until processing can no longer continue or performance deteriorates spectacularly. Here, I think, some loss in precision would attend using a generic term like 'storage error' instead of the traditional one. John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
