You are correct but it's very unlikely to be fixed. The default is FLAG(WARNING) so why does IBM even bother producing informational messages that are conditionally displayed. Does anyone run FLAG(INFO)? Is there anything useful produced?
Jon Perryman. >________________________________ > From: Don Poitras <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Friday, October 18, 2013 10:38 AM >Subject: Re: An IPCS question > > >Jon, > I'm happy with it being informational. I don't feel it should have >been a warning. The doc says that FLAG suppresses informational, but >we've seen evidence that it doesn't. So it's either a doc erorr or >a bug. Either way, an ETR is in order. > >In article <[email protected]> you >wrote: >> FLAG does not suppress informational messages (BLS18064I No symbols found). >> You may feel it should have been a warning but IBM classified it as >> informational. > >> Jon Perryman. > > > >> >________________________________ >> > From: Don Poitras <[email protected]> >> > >> > >> >From the book: >> > >> >The FLAG severity parameters and the messages transmitted follow. >> >WARNING is the IPCS-defined default. >> >... >> >TERMINATING >> >? Transmits only TERMINATING messages and suppresses INFORMATIONAL, >> >? WARNING, ERROR, and SERIOUS (SEVERE) messages. > >-- >Don Poitras - SAS Development - SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive >[email protected] (919) 531-5637 Cary, NC 27513 > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
