On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:50:53 -0500, Donald Likens wrote: > > >TMECVTD > +0 00000000 08670000 10182013 00000000 > >The time is not correct (the date is). Any ideas on what I am doing wrong? By >my calculations the time should be 14:52:00.16. > Since IBM refuses to document the behavior of STCKCONV (they say it should be "common knowledge" in response to my RCF), it's pretty hard to say any result is right or wrong.
And it has been discussed here that among various SMF record types there are radically different conventions for representation of the timestamp. Some argue that this is proper given radically different requirements for range, precision, and API among those various various record types. I'm unmoved by the argument. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
