On Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:21:22 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote: > >In IBM's implementation I think both the US Spanish and UK English >produce better results than the known-to-be-defective US English >tables. > I know I haven't a great deal of credibility in the z community. But do you mean that people other than me are aware of this, yet IBM declines to fix it? (IBM rejected my PMR, saying it was an ASCII/ EBCDIC sensitivity; WAD. Inexcusable, IMO; not even on grounds of compatibility.)
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
