>Hey, I do not need ALETs in the plist. Interesting. Over 25 years late to the party (this support was introduced in the 80's).
>And didn't need the call macro to overlay data following the plist. It doesn't seem right to blame the macro for correctly implementing its long-existing rule that requires your plist to be long enough to hold the ALETs in this sort of case (which apparently you did not do). If avoiding the ARs in the back part of the parameter area is a function you would like in CALL, a submitted requirement would help to make it a reality. Note that ATTACHX, LINKX, and XCTLX follow the same protocol so would also provide such support. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
