On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 7:09 AM, David Crayford <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 12/12/2013 9:05 PM, John McKown wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 1:24 AM, Arthur Fichtl <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  I'm just curious whether anybody out there has MVS Quick Reference from
>>> Chicago Soft installed.
>>> At my former assignment we had it and used it extensively. MVSQR is much
>>> more powerful than Lookat and it provides a comfortable UI.
>>>
>>> Note: I'm not affiliated with that company, just a user.
>>>
>>> Arthur
>>>
>>>
>>>  Oh, yes! If we didn't have it, the programmers would be unable to do
>> their
>> job. And Production Control would be out for blood (management's). My
>> manager uses the DASD information as the corner stone of his space
>> reporting.
>>
>>
>>
> Would they be seduced by a GUI?
>

Most likely, yes. If it had the ability to "read" the z/OS job output
somehow so that they could "double click" on something and then have the
GUI interface pop up a dialog box, or even a browser page. I am not sure,
but I think that they'd like the RD/z package. Of course, that is much more
expensive than TSO/ISPF and so it totally out of the question around here.


>
> I wonder how many mainframers would stick to what they're comfortable with
> even if a GUI interface came along that totally nuked the old school UI.
>

I might be one of those. But I would at least look at it to see if _I_
thought that it "totally nuked" the old UI.

I use Linux/Intel by preference (at home) and Windows (because I am force
to at work). And I always have a number of command line prompts running on
Linux (not Windows). I usually only use a GUI for things that I think
"need" it. For me, that would be like a word processor, spread sheet,
graphics package, etc.


>
>
>


-- 
This is clearly another case of too many mad scientists, and not enough
hunchbacks.

Maranatha! <><
John McKown

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to