Hi John,  

Your comment is wise:  Just because you can do something doesn't mean it's 
worth doing.  This is a great summary of our quest to zIIP enable a bit of our 
COBOL code.  Of course, this also means you have to do your homework because it 
may just turn out that, in some cases, it's *definitely* worth it.  A System z 
ISV in this day and age can't afford to miss those cases (at least that's my 
philosophy).

For example, zIIP enabling our core HostBridge products, "Base" and "JSE" (our 
CICS-based JavaScript Engine), was a no-brainer  Likewise with HB Socket 
Support (zIIP-enabled EZASOKET alternative).  On the other hand, our COBOL/BMS 
utility transactions???  Not so much.  

I must add that this "break-even" assessment is a moving target because zOS 
processor switching overhead seems to be trending down (and our own code paths 
are getting shorter). Note also that the model of the System z hardware makes a 
big difference.  If the GPs are knee-capped relative to the zIIPs, the GP 
savings and potential improvement in throughput are staggering in some cases.

Russ Teubner
HostBridge Technology

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to