Juergen, What are you trying to accomplish ? Scott ford www.identityforge.com from my IPAD
> On Jan 24, 2014, at 4:19 AM, Juergen Weber <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > has anybody knowledge/experience of the consequences of POSIX(ON) ? > > Some C runtime library functions require POSIX(ON) (especially pthreads and > friends). > > Why is POSIX(ON) not set by default for 31 bit code? I tried to search in > documentation for costs and disadvantages of POSIX(ON), the only thing I > could find was in z/OS Language Environment Programming Reference: > > "The default value for AMODE 64 is POSIX(ON)." > > So, why is this not for AMODE(31) ? > > "One of the effects of POSIX(ON) is the enablement of POSIX signal handling > semantics, which interact closely with the Language Environment condition > handling semantics." > > What are the consequences of this? And for code that does not use threads? > > Greetings, > Juergen > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
