In
<CAE6x8Q6u0p0-CXOnkOv=qp9uhfqm3uasggomnug5_c4dgob...@mail.gmail.com>,
on 02/06/2014
at 04:11 PM, Mark Pace <[email protected]> said:
>I hate having these PTFs in my SMPPTS that every time I install an
>RSU the APPLY tries to install this PTF again, and I spend more
>time researching why the PTF didn't APPLY.
Then stop researching them. The ones to worry about are the ACTION and
DOC holds.
>Am I being short sighted?
Yes. If you REJECT a PTF then you have have to receive it at a later
date, and that may be awkward. Let SMP deal with the hold data in a
normal fashion.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
