On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 03:07:29 -0600, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: >Sri h Kolusu wrote: > >>Martin, >>Thanks for clarifying what OP really wanted. > >I would also say thanks to Martin and also to you for providing this very >interesting DFSORT solution. > >There is also another way to do this nice trick/stunt: > >Get a LISTC of datasets and place it in a dataset / member (not &LL) using >your DFSORT method. > >Then, using JCL INCLUDE statement, submit the second job, thus avoiding using >&&L. My personal preference. If the second step crashes, I don't like >to rerun LISTC again ( I'm too cheap and lazy ;-D ), but only from the second >step. > >I hope Binaymin Dissen can use your suggestion. > Most of the suggestions don't address Binyamin's concern with the limit on concatenation size.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
