On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 22:47:26 -0800, Ed Jaffe wrote:

>There should still be write inhibit "switch" for a volume, even if only
>a logical one. It can be very useful, when running under z/VM, to be
>able to define some z/OS volumes as read-only. It would be nice if you
>could do something similar in a z/OS LPAR.

Let's turn the discussion around Ed, and inject a little left-field logic. Why 
run z/OS in an LPAR at all ?.
It's already running under a hipervisor - why not just junk PR/SM (and CPs) and 
run everybody on ILFs under z/VM ?.

If IBM can do their development under z/VM, why can't we as customers avail 
ourselves of the inherent advantages.
For "free" of course, just like PR/SM ... win/win (except maybe IBM and a few 
ISVs .... ;-)

Shane ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to