Hi Ed, We use the '++' parameter in LOADxx so it will use the IODF at IPL time whose token matches the current "switched to" IOCDS. Dynamic changes are really no different then doing an actual "POR" in that regard. DR is not an issue.
Thanks. Dick On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Ed Finnell <[email protected]> wrote: > Don't forget to update the LOAD parms to reflect new IODEFs and the > considerations for DR. For safety's sake I'd schedule the POR just to keep > Murphy > at the oasis. > > > In a message dated 3/15/2014 6:32:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [email protected] writes: > > Thnak you for the explanation. I appreciate it. > I was really curious about the reasons and now I see you were curious > too ;-) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
