Shane Ginnane write: >I was referring to the contortions involved in the introduction of >"specialty engines".
Yes, I know. I refer you to my previous answer. Martin Packer writes: >Actually "more slower engines" applies here as well. Getting a bit more interesting, especially as engines get/got "taller," but at least as a first order approximation my answer holds. Let's put it this way: 1969 ought to be on the short candidate list of years most important to computing. :-) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Timothy Sipples VCT Architect Executive (Based in Singapore) E-Mail: [email protected] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
