On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 19:00:00 -0400, zMan wrote: >Just curious: why not just put granular timestamps on the messages? >Wouldn't that have been simpler? > Perhaps. Depends on how many places messages are issued. If they all funnel through a single formatting routine, easy.
BTW, I understand that SMF logs have no consistent timestamps. IIRC, JWG has defended this malpractice based on the tradeoff between sometimes needless granularity and bandwidth. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
