At 09:44 -0500 on 04/29/2014, Scott Barry wrote about Re: CA JMR and
shared JES V2R1 migration:
It's a JES log text-format change -- the offset to the SYSTEM
information is different and the CA JMR software architecture
requires that you tell it the exact position with a parameter
SYSIODF, not considering the possible mixed-OS environment having
different offset-locations -- why it's not a "scan to the next
non-blank field" is beyond me.
From the description it looks to me to be an bug/design flaw in the
IBM JES2 Compatibility support. The tolerance patch should have made
the V1R13 layout compatible with the V2R1 format by padding the class
with blanks so the SYSTEM is at the same offset in both systems.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
