On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Binyamin Dissen <[email protected] > wrote:
> Subspace groups are not secure. A program can freely reset their subspace > group. > Another wonderful idea shot down by cruel reality. > > If you play nicely, the subspace groups help. > > Just "blue skying", but I wonder how much it would "cost" to use them in a highly multi-threaded "server" to enhance reliability. Especially if the server, like CICS, ran user supplied transaction code. Or is the UNIX way of using separate processes, in separate address spaces, simply "better" - FSVO "better". I know some UNIX people who are bemoaning the increased use of threads in a UNIX environment due to possible cross task memory corruption. -- There is nothing more pleasant than traveling and meeting new people! Genghis Khan Maranatha! <>< John McKown ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
