First a clarification. APF authorization has nothing to do with LLA. LLA is mechanism for finding certain PDS(E) members quickly by remembering their physical location. While LLA in practice is used mostly for load modules, it can be use for certain other PDS(E)s as well. APF and LLA are unrelated except by the company they often keep.
The way to know whether a PDS(E) is APF authorized is to issue this MVS command: d prog,apf Every APF library is listed along with its DASD volume, or 'SMS' if it's SMS managed. If your purported APF library is displayed and on the volume indicated, it's authorized. Otherwise it's not. If your IEASYSxx member contains LNKAUTH=APFTAB, then even your linklist libraries are authorized only if they are named in PROGxx. If you STEPLIB or JOBLIB or TASKLIB to a specific set of PDS(E)s, then *every* library in that list must be named as above or else the entire set is un-authorized. . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 626-302-7535 Office 323-715-0595 Mobile [email protected] From: Micheal Butz <[email protected]> To: [email protected], Date: 05/27/2014 01:25 PM Subject: Re: LLA questions Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> Yes thru TASID Sent from my iPhone > On May 27, 2014, at 11:36 AM, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > In > <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAADO3kaXBOTJGmkWYxtxnvxbCgAAAEAAAALxLJC1Dd/[email protected]>, > on 05/26/2014 > at 07:37 PM, MichealButz <[email protected]> said: > >> I have an APF authorized library, That is LLA managed via LIBRARIES >> statement in CSVLLAXX in parmlib > > Have you verified that it is indeed authroized? > >> I am getting CSV019I (Library not accessed from a APF lib) abend >> even though the dataset is in my APF authorized steplib > > Have you verified that *every* library in the concatenation is > authorized? > > >> L do a BLDL before I do a load DE of the module does it the exit >> get invoked when I do the bldl ? > > No. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
