[email protected] (R.S.) writes: > Let me rephrase: Memory redundancy is not unique to mainframes. > It can be mirroring as well. Mirroring consumes more memory than RAIM, > but non mainframe memory is dozen times cheaper, so it's still not so > bad.
re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014g.html#63 Costs of core similar to disks ... real CKD DASD hasn't been manufactured for decades ... just simulated on industry standard disks (at significant price premium) past posts mentioning CKD, multi-track search, FBA, etc http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#dasd and http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014f.html#64 non-IBM: SONY new tape storage - 185 Terabytes on a tape http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014f.html#65 non-IBM: SONY new tape storage - 185 Terabytes on a tape http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014g.html#16 non-IBM: SONY new tape storage - 185 Terabytes on a tape http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014g.html#75 non-IBM: SONY new tape storage - 185 Terabytes on a tape http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014g.html#79 non-IBM: SONY new tape storage - 185 Terabytes on a tape -- virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
