Is it actually your intention to allow batch jobs to run without an associated user ID?
Did anyone ever reply to #55? Did it produce the same set of messages? Does the change to the RACFVARS class suggested in the RACF Messages and Codes manual seem reasonable for your site? :>: -----Original Message----- :>: From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On :>: Behalf Of Mainframe Mainframe :>: Sent: Monday, June 23, 2014 9:00 PM :>: To: [email protected] :>: Subject: setprog command RACF issue :>: :>: setprog command from batch gets RACF error. We need to find a way to fix :>: this: :>: # :>: IEFC165I // SETPROG APF,ADD,DSNAME=TUL.AUTHLOAD, 041 :>: VOLUME=USR003 :>: *54 IEFC166D REPLY Y/N TO EXECUTE/SUPPRESS COMMAND :>: R 54,Y :>: IEE600I REPLY TO 54 IS;Y :>: SETPROG APF,ADD,DSNAME=TUL.AUTHLOAD,VOLUME=USR003 :>: IEFC165I // SETPROG APF,ADD, 070 :>: DSNAME=ODI.AUTHLOAD,SMS :>: 55 IEFC166D REPLY Y/N TO EXECUTE/SUPPRESS COMMAND :>: ICH70007I USER AUTHORITY CANNOT BE USED FOR THIRD-PARTY 072 :>: AUTHORIZATION CHECK FOR USER (++++++++) GROUP ( ) :>: BECAUSE THE EXECUTION NODE (N1 ) IS NOT LOCAL. :>: UACC WILL BE USED. :>: CSV410I DATA SET TUL.AUTHLOAD1 ON VOLUME USR003 ADDED TO :>: APF LIST ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
