On 5 July 2014 11:55, Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]> wrote: > A less 'easy' alternative would be to introduce types, and associated > instructions: GBLA32, GBLA64, SETA32, SETA64, EQU32, EQU64, ...
If someone for some reason decided to do it this way, I'd expect GBLG, SETG, and so on... Tony H. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
