[email protected] (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
> That might have made sense if CMS had full capability to LINK and ACCESS
> MVS volumes, and to FILEDEF data sets via catalog lookup, and to XEDIT
> PDS (later PDSE) members.  Otherwise not.

re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014h.html#99 TSO Test does not support 65-bit 
debugging?
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2014h.html#103 TSO Test does not support 65-bit 
debugging?

during the FS period:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submain.html#futuresys

somebody in the (burlington mall) vm370/cms development group pretty
much did all that support ... but it didn't ship.

then with the demise of FS, there was mad rush to get stuff back into
the 370 product pipelines. it was at this time that the head of POK
to convince corporate to kill  the vm370/cms product and move all the
people to pok to work on mvs/xa (or otherwise mvs/xa wouldn't ship on
schedule some 6-7yrs later). Lots of stuff in burlington was lost in
the shutdown ... including all the CMS support for native MVS volumes,
and the person responsible (along with numerous others) managed to
escape the move (lots going to DEC to work on vax/vms ... old joke that
head of POK was one of the major contributors to vax/vms).

eventually endicott managed to save the vm370/cms product mission, but
had to reconstitute a development group from scratch ... various stuff
in vmshare archives about code quality during this period:
http://vm.marist.edu/~vmshare

endicott focus was then much more on vm370/cms compatibility with dos/vs
(than mvs). you would find large numbers doing interactive work on
vm370/cms and then shipping stuff (w/jcl) to mvs for execution (either
mvs running under vm370 on the same machine or over the network between
vnet and jes2 networking). inside ibm this was major mode of development
... i've mentioned before doing the channel-extender work for STL (now
silicon valley lab) so the 300 people from the ims group moved to
offsite bldg could have local channel attached vm370/cms interactive
computing support back to stl datacenter. misc. posts
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/submisc.html#channel.extender

people use to horrible MVS/TSO human factors would have hardly noticed
the issues with remote 3270 support (controller running at 19.2kbits/sec
back to datacenter) ... but was major issue for people use to vm370/cms
interactive computing with local channel attached 3270 controllers.

-- 
virtualization experience starting Jan1968, online at home since Mar1970

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to