Given up to 30% variability run over run with z/OS, I wouldn't find 1% statistically significant...
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Binyamin Dissen < [email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 13 Aug 2014 13:45:14 +0000 DASDBILL2 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > :>How much is "slightly more"? Ten to the minus 2 power of one percent? > Ten to the minus 5 power of one percent? Perhaps you could display the raw > numbers before and after. > > The section of code which does other stuff than just examining this storage > took about 1% more cpu. I have not tried a more specific test case. The > CPU is > 1% less when a key8 subpool is used. > > :>----- Original Message ----- > :> > :>From: "Binyamin Dissen" <[email protected]> > :>To: [email protected] > :>Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2014 5:16:17 AM > :>Subject: Is there a CPU cost to using key9 storage while running with > key8 > :> > :>I allocated some storage in key9 so that one need not switch keys to > :>access/update. It seems to cause the code to use slightly more CPU. > > -- > Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> > http://www.dissensoftware.com > > Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel > > > Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, > you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. > > I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, > especially those from irresponsible companies. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
