On Thu, 14 Aug 2014 13:38:03 +0000, DASDBILL2 wrote: >It is my cold and fuzzy recollection that 6144 was in vogue for a few years >when that value was deemed to be VERY good on a 3340 DASD and not too shabby >[1] for most other flavors. >Bill Fairchild > >[1] Or, more precisely, "okay" or "swell". > ISTR that because 4KiB did not fit nicely in a 3350(?) track 6KiB became fashionable, perhaps even for page data sets.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
