You may also have an IDC3009I message.  If so, I would check those codes as 
well.

Just a guess, that the IDCAMS handles VSAM better than IEFBR14.  IDCAMS is code 
that works with the VSAM environment better.  IEFBR14 is a do nothing program.  
So may not support this process.

CAXWA count of active users has reached 32767, the maximum allowed. 
Programmer Response: Do not use the catalog until one of the current jobs 
allocated to it ends or logs off.

You may want to open an SR with IBM.  This may be a bug with either prior z/OS 
release, or v2.1.

Try this command and see what CAXWA looks like
F CATALOG,REPORT,PERFORMANCE



Lizette


> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Christian D
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 6:32 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Deleting Cluster Using IEFBR14 or IDCAMS
> 
> Hi Group,
> 
> Is there a difference in using the utility IEFBR14 and IDCAMS in deleting VSAM
> cluster Dataset ?
> 
> I used to Delete the Cluster Before using IEFBR14 before but now it fails.
> 
> 
> //DEL   EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
> 
> //TS        DD  DISP=(MOD,DELETE),UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(TRK,(0)),
> 
> //   DSN=CHRIS.TESTING.DB2.LL1
> 
> 
> 
> doesn't clear data set but raise
> 
> 
> 
> IGD17105I CATALOG ERROR WHILE DELETING DATA SET  730
> 
> CHRIS.TESTING.DB2.LL1
> 
> RETURN CODE IS 84 REASON CODE IS 0 IGG0CLFK
> 
> Explanation from Manual :
> 
> 84          Explanation: CAXWA count of active users has
>             reached 32767, the maximum allowed.
> 
> The Deletion works well with IDCAMS but not with IEFBR14.
> 
> 
> Z/OS : 2.1
> 
> 
> Chris
> 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to