On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 17:32:19 +0000, Pommier, Rex <[email protected]> wrote:
>And potentially a third problem that was mentioned by Anthony Thompson that >has been overlooked as well. The OP posted an ?>AMBLIST of module STRXFRM >showing it as an ALIAS of EDC@@248. Anthony pointed out that on his 2.1 >system, both STRXFRM >and EDC@@248 are aliases of EDC4$09E. My 1.13 system >matches Anthony's 2.1 system. Is the fact that the OP's system >appears to be >different in SCEELKED another problem? >Rex Hi Rex, Using the wrong verion of SCEELKED is the entire problem of getting a return code 4 on the binder when the OP applied UI18451. As you noticed he is not using a z/OS V2R1 or a z/os V1R13 SCEELKED. I am not sure how far you have to back to get one like he is using. He is lucky that the apply required a return code of 0 to be successful ! Doug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
