On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 18:34:39 +0000, Mark Yuhas wrote: > >I would also think that there would be extra overhead with PRSM deciding which >LPAR gets resources and if it is the z/VM LPAR, then z/VM deciding which guest >gets the resources. Seems like a duplication of effort. Then, of course, >would JES2 tolerate this as well? > Perhaps even worse, nested paging. Might that be alleviated by either some use of V=R (is this possible?) so only the guests but not CP pages, or by defining an absurdly large virtual storage for the guests so only CP but not the guests page?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
