Could be hardware, could be an attack. Guess start with packet traces. We  
had a couple of lengthy runs
had to put on 'milking machines' before the cable could be  replaced. 
 
 
In a message dated 9/15/2014 1:52:56 P.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

It was  an assembler macro, so “MACRO blah”, but we do this a lot and the 
same file  re-uploaded with the same options worked. But yeah, maybe 
something dropped a  byte and that led it to misread…only why did it (a) work 
at 
all and (b) put  the directive in the file, replacing the MACRO line?  Mystery!


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to