-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:24 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: ISRDDN SHOWS MEMBER ALIAS
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:27 +0000, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>
>Not sure what you mean by 3-level concatenation. ...
>
Menu RefList RefMode Utilities Workstation Help
—————————————————————————————————————
ISREDM01 Edit Entry Panel
ISPF Library:
Project . . . PROJECT
Group . . . . TEST . . . PROD . . . . . .
Type . . . . LISTING
Member . . . (Blank or pattern for member selection list)
OK. Up to 4 (not 3) data sets concatenated, and up to 3 qualifiers in each
and the first and last must be identical in all data sets. And no mixture
of Legacy data sets and UNIX directories. Silly rules.
(I'm informed that one can chisel 2 or more qualifiers in each field as
long as all fit in 8 characters.)
>If I cancel out, I get nothing in SYSPROG.REXXLIB, but if I make a change,
>it saves the modified member into SYSPROG.REXXLIB.
>
Good. Does it check on entry that the target (first) library is writeable
according to RACF rules?
-- gil
Gil,
I don't think ISRDDN gives a rip about these edit rules - other than the one
about mixing legacy and Unix. In my ISRDDN concatenation that I was editing I
have 18 datasets concatenated, and I can select a member from any of the first
16 (which is all ISRDDN will show me). These datasets have anywhere from 2-4
qualifiers and they are all over the board as far as DSN is concerned from
system libraries to production to development/test libraries.
My SYSPROC concatenation of which I can edit members of the first 16 libraries
from within ISRDDN.
SYSPROG.REXXLIB
MYCO.THIRD.VALD.CMDPROC
MYCO.THIRD.CMDPROC
CPAC.CMDPROC
TMG.REXX
MYCO2.ABC.CMDPROC
MYCO2.PGMR.REXXLIB
SYS1.SBLSCLI0
MYCO.VAB857.VABCLIB
SYS1.HRFCLST
GIM.SGIMCLS0
SYS1.DGTCLIB
ISP.SISPCLIB
FMN.SFMNCLIB
FFST.V120ESA.SEPWCENU
SYS1.SCBDCLST
EOY.SEOYCLIB
EOX.SEPHCLB1
As far as checking SAF upon entry, the answer is no it doesn't. I just
verified that RACF didn't fail an edit of the first library until the user
tried to save when she just has read access to the library.
Rex
The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from
disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not
the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this
message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure,
distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it,
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard
copy format. Thank you.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
