How about, on the existing allocated message, listing the Dataclas, Mgmtclas, Storclas, and Storgrop? How about, on the existing dsn deleted message, listing the # volumes, # extents, and # tracks currently allocated?
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[email protected]> wrote: > Unfortunately, in the case of SMS, you have to write the message. > It's rigged for silent running. > > PS: There a lot of people who hate verbose systems. > > - > -teD > - > Original Message > From: Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 10:09 > To: [email protected] > Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > Subject: Re: TSO in batch, RECEIVE storage class - solved > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 08:03:22 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote: > >>John Compton wrote: >> >>>I'm sorry to say that I appear to have wasted your time. >> >>No. No need to apologise. The mere fact that you said what the root cause >>was, made it all extremely worthwhile and educational. >> > I believe that whenever the OS overrides an explicit specification by > a user it should issue a message. That would save much time otherwise > wasted. > > -- gil > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
