> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden > > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:41:44 +0000, Bob Shannon <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> We're making the change from LNKAUTH=LNKLST to LNKAUTH=APFTAB > > > >I'm curious why you are making this change. I view LNKAUTH=LNLKST as a > >godsend. > > In general, it seems auditors frown upon that option. I've had to make the > change at several > different clients of mine in the past.
Seems reasonable to me. Consider the case of placing a load library of mostly installation-written COBOL batch programs into the LNKLST to avoid having to code perhaps thousands of //STEPLIB or //JOBLIB statements in the "nightly batch run". Would you really want those programs to be APF-authorized? -jc- ********************************************************************** Information contained in this e-mail message and in any attachments thereto is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message, delete any copies held on your systems, notify the sender immediately, and refrain from using or disclosing all or any part of its content to any other person. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
