> I would hope that most of that is basically irrelevant status type > messages (job started / ended type stuff).
So would I!! :) I would imagine most information in 'the log' is largely irrelevant from a day-to-day point of view, until such time as you need to find out 'what happened' in problem situations, where it's relevance of having a full log of everything(ish) suddenly becomes rather more crucial (and of course, it usually one of the first things IBM ask for). Admittedly, only a fraction of it will probably be "important" for diagnostic purposes. I expect there is a certain amount of application 'noise' in there, which is irrelevant for system purposes, but may be quite important for the application folks (again, perhaps only in retrospective diagnosis of issues). On 24 November 2014 at 21:06, John McKown <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Graham Harris <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > 25million > > > > > Ouch. Which leads to another question: How is this information used? At > that density I simply don't see a way for a unaugmented human to do much of > anything with it. > > I would hope that most of that is basically irrelevant status type > messages (job started / ended type stuff). > > > -- > The temperature of the aqueous content of an unremittingly ogled > culinary vessel will not achieve 100 degrees on the Celsius scale. > > Maranatha! <>< > John McKown > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
