Thomas Conley wrote: >I've always had to review the SMF data, then make adjustments. No ROTs or >sizing recommendations I'm aware of.
Please forgive my ignorance, but what SMF records? Of course I have looked in my SMF book, but must have missed something obvious or used wrong search arguments. Thanks in advance. Peter Relson wrote: >There is no rule of thumb. It's very likely that 16M is way too small, but >we're not likely to change the default. 128M is fairly common, I believe. Ok if you say so. Could that part of MFM not be included in Health Checker so we all can see what sizes are recommended? Groete / Greetings Elardus Engelbrecht ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
