> I thought that I did that. The names of the voters are not revealed to me in the DeveloperWorks site. I am sure your vote was counted. I should have said: "Why have only a few people voted for these requirements".
I appealed for votes in several venues. I spread my posts out over several weeks, so I have a good idea of where a voter might have heard of this requirement. My guess is that only five people from IBM-MAIN voted for "SRCHFOR within SDSF job queue". There are currently a total of 29 votes, which is relatively good. fyi. I had earlier asked for SRCHFOR within DSLIST and SRCHFOR within a member list, both of which were implemented. It is a different group of developers for SDSF, so it is not clear that they will implement these similar suggestions. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
