In article <[email protected]> you wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:42:52 -0500, Don Poitras wrote: > > > >> Good, Better, Excellent. OpenSSH has proven itself sofar to be useful. > > > >I just hope we finally get a binary scp. The current one is pretty > >useless for most of the stuff I use scp for on other hosts. > > > Does sftp not suffice? I stumbled on a page that mentions an enhanced > sftp doing UNIX<-->DOS newline conversion. Similar enhancement might > do ASCII<-->EBCDIC for which others have wished (but which EBCDIC?)
It's not really the "s" part of scp that I find useful. I use ftp and nfs as my normal methods of copying to/from z/OS. Everywhere else, I use scp. > And from ASCII UNIX I have done such as the cumbersome: > ssh MVS "pax -w list-of-files | iconv -f ISO8859-1 -t IBM-1047" | pax -r > >> I hope there is also a menu-driven presentation beside the usual > >> batch/prompting way of working. > > > "Menu-driven"? Clarify. ISPF? Other? > -- gil -- Don Poitras - SAS Development - SAS Institute Inc. - SAS Campus Drive [email protected] (919) 531-5637 Cary, NC 27513 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
