Mehrshad:
No, you do not understand. I was answering Tom on why COBOL
should be made to have access to data above the bar (2GB address
range) now, not later.
That a COBOL program can't execute in the area above 2GB is a
completely different issue.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
On 01/17/2015 01:52 AM, Mehrshad Manshadi wrote:
Dear Steve
As I understand from your explanations, compiling COBOL in 64 bit mode is not
useful.
But the question is that this much of addressable of memory (64 Bit ) is for
what ?Because as I know most the applications in mainframe are developed by
COBOL and C.(Mostly COBOL)Best regardsManshadi
On Thursday, January 15, 2015 11:37 PM, Steve Thompson
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 01/14/2015 07:51 PM, Tom Ross wrote:
<SNIPPAGE>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
