On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:31:14 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>I should add that in general in the US and most countries copyright notices
>are unnecessary. I compare them to a "Private Property" sign on your front
>lawn: it would still be private property without the sign, but the sign warns
>your neighbors that you might be serious about it.
>
But beware of "adverse possession"!
http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_13100029
>Under current US copyright law and the Berne Convention, copyright inures to
>the author of a creative work upon the moment s/he "fixes the work in a
>tangible medium" (including, by statute, computer memory). So if you think up
>a story and recite it for your friends you do not own a copyright, but as soon
>as you write the story down or key it into your computer you do, notice or no.
>
Are the airwaves a "tangible medium"? (I assume tape and disk are). If a
performer broadcasts
a performance, never having recorded it, may I record it off the air without
violating copyright?
I understand that in days of yore a performance of a work in the public domain
could
not be copyright. Old phonograph records of classical music used to bear the
warning
that the performance *times* (e.g. 10:33) were copyright by the artist and
publisher.
I think things have got saner.
>Similarly copyright registration is a big help in litigation, but you
>nonetheless own the copyright even if you never pay the government a nickel or
>fill out any official forms.
>
Besides, isn't it a way for the LoC to get free books, records, movies?
-- gil
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
