On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 09:03:56 -0700 Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote:
:>Thanks. In my case the called program is a pre-existing utility that is :>shipped AC=0 in an APF library. :>To confirm: there is no integrity issue introduced here, right? The called :>program will run non-authorized, correct? Unless action is taken it will run authorized. Since it is placed in an APF library, the installation (or IBM) has declared that it will not create an exposure. :>-----Original Message----- :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On :>Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen :>Sent: Sunday, March 15, 2015 8:57 AM :>To: [email protected] :>Subject: Re: APF-authorized calling non-authorized :> :>On Sun, 15 Mar 2015 06:38:37 -0700 Charles Mills <[email protected]> wrote: :> :>:>Am I RTFM correctly? An APF-authorized program may successfully call a :>:>non-APF-authorized program, provided the called program resides in an :>:>APF-authorized library? :> :>:>The called program need not be AC=0, but its containing load library must :>be :>in the APF library list. Is that correct? :> :>That is the standard way. Only the main program should be marked AC=1 - the :>subroutines AC=0. :> :>---------------------------------------------------------------------- :>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, :>send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN -- Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
