XMEM code looks fine. You should be aware that there may be abends if the
target address space is swapped out.

No RC check from IKJCT441.

I would suggest running GTF trace on the code and verify the data is what you
expect.

On Mon, 16 Mar 2015 18:30:19 +0000 "Cannaerts, Jan" <[email protected]>
wrote:

:>Hello everyone,
:>
:>
:>
:>Because I know less than most here have forgotten by now, I haven't posted 
yet. Usually I know where I have to start looking, and what manuals I have to 
scour, but this has got me quite stumped.
:>
:>
:>I have stolen an assembler routine to peek in to other address spaces, and 
modified it to fit my needs. Some of you might know it, it's on the CBT Tape as 
XMSLOOK.
:>
:>For those of you who want to know why I would need such a routine, I have no 
problems divulging if people really want to know.
:>
:>
:>As for my problem;
:>
:>I have made a small test program that holds a piece of storage paged in 
memory, it spits out the virtual address to that piece of memory on sysprint so 
that I can easily retrieve it. Calling the assembler routine to peek inside 
that address space from REXX on our test LPAR, works flawlessly. I plug in the 
ASID, the virtual address and the length (main part of my customization 
efforts), and it spits the contents back out to REXX. I'm very happy with this.
:>
:>
:>Then I migrated it to our production LPAR to put it to its originally 
intended use, but for some reason it doesn't manage to switch address spaces 
and spits out the memory of the home/primary address space instead. Obviously 
there is something I'm completely overlooking, most likely a security setting. 
I want to say it compiles the same on both LPARS, around the AS-switching part 
anyways. I've searched around, digging up the documentation for the MODESET and 
AXSET macros. I've gone through the execution, and the only thing that I 
(don't) see happening, is that GPR 0 is not being set on the production LPAR as 
it is on the test LPAR after the MODESET macro. I currently don't have access 
to our system, I will again in ~12 hours, when the US is asleep. Feel free to 
ask questions, any and all that I can readily answer, I will answer. For any 
listings / dumps / settings the timeframe has been mentioned...
:>
:>
:>The edited assembler routine's code can be found here; 
http://pastebin.com/JduqS6T6
:>
:>
:>You'll have to excuse me for the most likely less than optimal code, I am new 
to assembler. With that being said, I am probably biting off (way) more than I 
can chew. But this is not something that will be used to sustain a production 
environment, it won't get called millions of times every day. It's just to 
create a tool to make my life easier, while at the same time not being so 
important that I depend on it completely. And I get to learn some assembler in 
the process.
:>
:>
:>I would've looked at access registers, if this didn't work so well on our 
test LPAR, maybe I should switch anyways...

--
Binyamin Dissen <[email protected]>
http://www.dissensoftware.com

Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel


Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain.

I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems,
especially those from irresponsible companies.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to