I can say the NOAWO is default in VS COBOL II compiler. Maybe a carry forward issue.
Lizette > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of David Speake > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 3:46 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: COBOL Compiller options in IGYCDOPT > > Is there a historian in the house? Why is NOAWO the IBM default - since > forever? I outlined for my SYSPROG the horrendous effect of LRECLs say of > 80 and 32720 on device end channel traffic, run time and resource utilization. > Question was raised about work loads that it might favor and why. > There may be such workloads but I cannot imagine what they might be nor > why. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
